On one side, we have geocentrists (often labeled as flat earthers) who always preach that Antarctica has not been fully explored and that the existence of a physical barrier is responsible for Earth's air pressure, without sufficient evidence. Many of them are motivated by religious texts. They claim that relative density and buoyancy fully replace gravity; this is clearly not the case! On the other side, we have heliocentrists claiming that all the long-distance observations that have changed the minds of millions are simply a misunderstanding of refraction. They claim to have observations to demonstrate curvature, but how is refraction or atmospheric lensing being accounted for? They also say spacetime curvature is exclusive to a globe. Can this claim be proven? Or were the definitions of gravity constructed with heliocentric assumptions that were never allowed to be questioned?

Ultimately, our best heliocentric evidence relies heavily on space agencies. Are flat earthers justified in their skepticism of NASA? Who is telling the truth? As graduates who walked past Neil Armstrong's statue every day on their way to engineering classes, Levi and Alex became obsessed with the shape debate. Can science undeniably prove that the Earth is moving and not the Sun? Or did humanity lose a century of intellectual progress to a $3 trillion fake industry? Let's set aside our emotions and look at the raw evidence.